In his recently-published memoirs, Egypt’s former foreign minister,
Nabil Fahmy, painted a clear picture of the prevalent mood inside Egypt’s
ruling establishment concerning the country’s stance towards great powers. In
the 2000s, he explains, former president Hosni Mubarak and many of his aides
“came to believe” that the United States was pushing for a regime change agenda
in Egypt. While Mubarak is long gone, Washington’s unsupportive attitude
towards the Egyptian government during the events of the Arab Spring
consolidated such views among a large number of Egyptian officials and
policymakers. Hence, an “extremely widespread” and potent “conspiracy theory”
has come to rule the day with regards to Egypt’s international relations. Fahmy
was no proponent of this theory, but in a meeting held with senior officials
soon after he took on the mantle of minister of foreign affairs in 2013, he put
forth what would become the motto of Egyptian foreign policy: “Over-dependence
on the United States or any other state is detrimental to our interests”.
In terms of impact, Egypt’s historic turn to the United States in the
aftermath of its 1973 war against Israel was one of the greatest reversals of
alliance in the modern history of the Middle East. It paved the way for decades
of a deep and multifaceted alliance between the two countries. Since the late
1970s, the US has provided Egypt with at least $80 billion in military and
economic aid, cooperated with Cairo in promoting Arab-Israeli peace, combatting
terrorism, and evicting Saddam Hussein’s forces from Kuwait. Bilateral
cooperation also included significant levels of trade and investment, and
biannual military exercises. However, the gradual US retreat from the Middle
East over the course of the last decade and rising Egyptian concerns about
frequent US denunciations of Cairo’s human rights abuses made the alliance look
like it had run its course.
Indeed, seeing US assistance suspended or delayed several times from
2013-17 over its human rights record, Cairo decided to diversify its
international allies, heavily engaging with the two rising stars on the stage
of world politics: Russia and China. Moscow had upgraded its involvement in the
Middle East, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria and becoming a major
player in the Libyan civil conflict. Two months into his presidency, President
Abdel Fattah al-Sisi visited Moscow. In the following few years, the value of
bilateral trade increased, Egypt purchased billions of dollars’ worth of
Russian military hardware (including fighter jets and attack helicopters), a
Russian industrial zone in Egypt was created, and the two countries signed a
strategic partnership agreement. Moreover, Russia bought a 30% stake in Egypt’s
giant Zohr gas field, and it is currently constructing Egypt’s first nuclear
power plant, located on the Mediterranean coast, pursuant to a deal to the tune
of $25 billion. Politically, the two countries are apprehensive about the
specter of radical Islamist movements, and they see eye-to-eye on developments
in both Syria and Libya. Of all these spheres of cooperation, the military one
seems to be the most crucial for Cairo. It includes not only the purchase of
sophisticated jets and weapons systems, but also military drills and efforts to
enhance the interoperability of the two armies.
If military ties cemented Egypt’s relations with Russia, it was
economic and business considerations that brought Egypt and China closer
together. Egypt had taken notice of China’s coming into bloom as an economic
superpower, and a political superpower-in-waiting. Keenness about upgrading its
ties with Beijing led to an extensive deepening of bilateral relations over the
past few years. Sino-Egyptian ties now involve numerous and frequent
presidential meetings, vigorous trade, investment and industrial relations, a
vibrant joint economic zone in Egypt’s Suez region, broad participation by
Chinese companies in the construction of Egypt’s new capital, and plans for a
vital Egyptian participation in China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative. As
a result, China has become Egypt’s main trading partner, surpassing the US,
Germany and Italy, Egypt’s traditional business partners. Low levels of
military and security cooperation have also been put in place in recent years.
A defining feature of Egyptian foreign policy over the decades was the
congruence between its policy towards superpowers on the one hand and domestic
economic policies and political plans on the other. In the 1950s and 1960s, for
instance, Nasser’s socialist policies and his quest for regional leadership
compelled him to turn to the Soviet bloc. In contrast, Sadat’s quest in the 1970s for economic development,
modernization and peace with Israel dictated closer ties with Western nations,
especially the US.
Today, the picture looks more ambivalent, and the lines have not been
clearly drawn. After all, America’s single-superpower moment seems to have
passed, but no bipolar or multipolar world structure has yet emerged in its
place. Cairo is clearly hedging its bets, wishing to have it all ways: US
military aid and diplomatic support, Russian military hardware and Chinese
capital. Whether simultaneously courting all parties is a viable policy over
the long-run, let alone at what cost, still remains to be seen. President’s
al-Sisi’s friendly relationship with US President Donald Trump notwithstanding,
the US administration had already threatened to impose sanctions on Egypt if it
went ahead with plans to purchase sophisticated fighter jets from Russia. At
any rate, if the Democratic candidate Joe Biden makes his way to the White
House, Egypt may have to make some hard choices.
Nael Shama
* This article
appeared first in a dossier titled “Egypt at the Crossroads: Pandemic,
Authoritarianism and Geopolitical Aspirations” (Italian Institute for
International Political Studies, September 2020).
No comments:
Post a Comment